Game was not review bombed, multiplayer is still bad after all the patches in most cases especially if you have a larger group than 2. It is just that 1°) although very decent, it cannot compare to the high standards set by the "best" games of the genre (Grim Dawn, POE.), 2°) almost all of the original development ideas that might have made it rise above the mass have been abandonned, resulting in a very basic, and therfore disappointing ARPG for many, and 3°) the release has been rushed with missing content (2 acts missing, seemingly "placeholder" endgame modes etc), bugs (although nothing too bad from my experience, just some pretty minor bugs, but others seem to have eperienced heavier issues) and an online multiplayer that did not work for days at launch which resulted in a pretty heavy review bombing. Originally posted by Khalgar:It is not a bad game by any means (gameplay feels good, there are some pretty interesting ideas here and there -although the game is a pretty standard ARPG-). Bad review are partly justified by a rushed release/promises not fullfiled, partly just dumb review bombing. Tl dr: the game is very decent, just not one of the best in the genre. It is not a bad game by any means (gameplay feels good, there are some pretty interesting ideas here and there -although the game is a pretty standard ARPG-).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |